Pietro Romeo Scomparin vs Veljko Krstic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Scomparin holds a distinct advantage in second serve performance, securing 50.91% of points compared to Krstic's 38.89%. This stat is often indicative of match outcomes.
• In return games, Krstic is stronger, winning 44.44% against opponents' second serves, whereas Scomparin claims 31.58%. This edge persists on first serve returns with Krstic at 32.43%, surpassing Scomparin's 27.59%.
• Under pressure, Krstic shows resilience, saving 57.14% of breakpoints compared to Scomparin's 40%, which could be critical during tense match moments.
• Both players exhibit similar match win rates over the past year, with Scomparin at 64.71% and Krstic closely behind at 62.5%.
• Both players favor clay surfaces, with Scomparin achieving a 61% win rate over Krstic's 49%. Both perform less admirably on hard courts.
• Scomparin faces slightly tougher opponents, averaging an opponent rank of 182.26, compared to Krstic's 194.63.
• If the match extends into a deciding set, Scomparin shows a higher success rate, winning 63% of such sets, while Krstic manages 50%.
• Scomparin's breakpoint conversion rate stands at 25%, whereas Krstic demonstrates greater efficiency, converting 50% of opportunities.
• Given these statistics, who holds the upperhand? Scomparin's clutch deciding set performance or Krstic's breakpoint prowess?
• The prediction largely depends on whether the match extends or who seizes critical points early.

Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):

Scomparin and Krstic's upcoming match is a tale of strengths pitted against each other. Scomparin's effectiveness on second serves and their ability to close out matches in deciding sets add a formidable layer to their game. This resilience could prove pivotal in tight scenarios.

Conversely, Krstic's superior return game and breakpoint conversion rate stand out. Their capacity to exploit opponents' weaknesses makes them formidable, especially if they can capitalize on early weaknesses.

The players' affinity for clay surfaces suggests an intense duel, yet Scomparin's slight edge on this surface might provide a tactical advantage. Match context will weigh in heavily, especially if the contest remains tight until the deciding moments.

Ultimately, Scomparin's well-rounded performance, coupled with high stakes instinct, marginally positions them as the likely winner of this contest.